A new report will be prepared instead of an expert report laundering TCDD in 25 train accident in which 340 citizen lost their lives and XNUMX passenger was injured. CHP Tekirdag Deputy Ilhami Ozcan Aygun, the new expert committee TCDD and the Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure with no consultancy or business relationship, objective and impartial actors are expected to be created by the expert academics, he said.
CumhuriyetAccording to the report of Mustafa Çakır, it was decided to establish a new expert committee at the Çorlu 8st High Criminal Court where the train accident that caused the death of 25 citizens and the injuries of 340 passengers in Çorlu on 1 July. Aygun, the CHP stressed that the decision was not reliable and objective, and that the report prepared by the former expert delegation of academics advising the TCDD administration and the Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure was not reliable and was not accepted in public conscience. Aygun pointed out that the former expert committee provided consultancy services to the General Directorate of TCDD between 2009-2014, and that he was the renovation project consultant of the Thrace Railway Line between 2012-2014 and Marmaray Project Consultancy in 2017. Saying that “it is obvious that the names that provide consultancy to the Ministry and TCDD do not meet the expectation of preparing an objective report,” said Aygun, adding that the new expert delegation will be selected from ray experts working at Yıldız Technical University, Anadolu University, Sakarya University and Istanbul Technical University. Aygun stated that they expect the new delegation to be formed from expert academicians who will act objectively and impartially with no consultancy or business relationship with the TCDD and the Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure.
Saying that the new delegation listed all the negligence of the accident, they demanded that senior executives prepare a scientific report demonstrating their responsibility in the accident, Aygun said. the statements of the defendants on trial are the confessions of negligence and unscientific management in TCDD. One of the accused defendants, Celaleddin Çabuk, Line maintenance and repair officer, stated that he was responsible for the 250 bridge and 2 bin 500 bridges from Edirne Kapıkule to Eskişehir on his own. He quickly explained that he had previously reported that there was no ballast holding wall in the 400 grille, including the grille where the accident occurred, but that it was not necessary. The statements of the accused defendants, Turgut Kurt, the Director of Railway Maintenance, also confess to the shortage of experts in TCDD. Kurt stated that the road guard cadres that had been prevented from accidents had been evacuated since 2001 and that he had written many times to refill these cadres, although no additional measures were taken. Kurt, who previously said that he was a 9 road watchman, explained the importance of road watchers. ”
1200 GUARD IS REQUIRED
Aygun, TCDD and the General Directorate of Meteorology there is no unit to work in coordination, 39 road crossing control officer (road guard) said that the task. Aygun said, “A road keeper can go about 10 km per day and 10 km. the number of road guards should be around 1200. At least the 5 road guard should have been present in the area where the accident in Çorlu was. It is not possible for a single line maintenance officer to control a large area. ” The new trial in the case 10 will be held in December.