Material damage caused by train accidents, TCDD and TCDD Taşımacılık A.Ş. caused the crisis.
The Court of Accounts pointed out that all accident losses have been covered by TCDD Tasimacilik A. In the audit report of the Court of Accounts, the details of the 'defect ratio' between the two companies took place and it was stated as follows:
WHO WILL TAKE THE EXPENSE?
According to the news of Veli Toprak from SÖZCÜ; “To determine the defect rates as a result of train accidents, TCDD and TCDD Taşımacılık A.Ş. It has been understood that the commissions established within their bodies generally set different liability rates, therefore the two companies could not reach an agreement on which party the damage should be recourse to. As a result of the failure to reach an agreement, mostly TCDD Taşımacılık A.Ş. This results in the failure to invoice TCDD for the accident expenses covered by the company and the company having to bear the cost. Although it may seem normal that the commissions created by two companies, one of which is an infrastructure operator and the other a train operator, reach different results in determining the liability ratio, the financial burden of failure to reach an agreement between the two companies is generally borne by TCDD Taşımacılık A.Ş. It keeps it on.”