Corlu Train Crash Key Question How Ballast Worn ?; 7 25, the third round trial of the 4 defendant case, which was opened in Çorlu regarding the train accident in which 10 child was killed, will be held in December. This is expected to be decided to form a committee for the new expert report victims before the hearing, 'TCDD Senior Management' under the name 1.5 ongoing investigation of the ballast in the case of the request to expand the investigation of the ballast is preparing to petition the prosecutor.
Newspaper WallAccording to Serkan Alan; 25 300 The third round hearing of the case opened in Çorlu regarding the train accident in which 10 was killed and 1 was killed in Çorlu 1.5 Heavy Penal Court in December. However, the 5 investigation, which included the “Top Management of TCDD için in order to reveal the negligence of the ballast layer in the train disaster, did not show any improvement in the year. XNUMX will go to the Corlu Chief Public Prosecutor's Office on Thursday and submit the petitions to the prosecutor's office requesting an extension of the investigation.
'VIEW OF THE PUNISHMENT POLICY'
Following the train accident, the Çorlu Chief Public Prosecutor's Office initiated an investigation against politicians, bureaucrats and persons in the top management of the TCDD on the grounds that “causing death and injury by negligence olmadı was not a place for prosecution. In the investigation conducted to cover the CD Top Management of TCDD adına in order to reveal the negligence that caused the ballast layer erosion, the remaining 1.5 could not be improved in the year. Sevgi Evren, the complainant's lawyer, replied to our question: “On the one hand, are there any drawbacks to conducting another investigation into the same incident while the trial continues?:
Adan Rather than the inconvenience, this is the appearance of an impunity policy. Turkey is experiencing in this way in the judicial system. If you want to protect someone, you can mute the file about it. You parse it, pretend you're investigating, and then shut it down with no pursuit. They wanted to do it all over again, but they couldn't. Because families started a vigil in front of the courthouse and said, 'We will fight until the facts are revealed and the responsible ones emerge.' This serialization file couldn't be closed for a year and a half. While the prosecution is trying to investigate from the surface, we say that we need to look at these points and people. occupational accidents in Turkey, omissions, dorms fires, Soma and what happened in Çorlu a result of efforts to bring this file to the impunity. "
'EXPECTATION DECISION IS WAITED IN WHERE THE BOILER LIVES'
Victim lawyers at the second round hearing immediately after the accident prepared by the request of the prosecutor's office objected to the expert report and requested the preparation of a new report. Mustafa Karaşahin and Sıddık Yarman, who entered the indictment and had a direct business relationship with TCDD, decided to prepare a new report and asked the expert name after the second hearing.
The lawyer Sevim Evren stated that the court had written a limited number of fields to the universities including Sakarya University, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul Technical University (ITU) and Eskişehir Osmangazi University.
Evren stated that a team to be determined by the court committee will prepare the report among the names coming from the universities and that the committee will make a discovery after the acceptance of the third hearing. Giderek The court requested a list of names from the universities. Now the court will appoint itself from this list of names. If we see this committee insufficient, we will demand new experts to be included in this committee. This will be revealed at the third round trial. In this session, it is expected to establish a committee that will look at this issue as a public problem with maximum quality, maximum neutrality and to decide on a discovery in the place of the accident. ”
AN ACADEMIAN AT ITU REJECTED THE EXPERTISE INCREASING THAT IT IS HELD IN THE PROJECT
Evren explained the reason why an academician working at ITU did not work as an expert:
Bir A teacher from ITU rejected the university's expert proposal, stating that he was involved in the project where the accident occurred. This is a good thing. We have a criminal complaint about other experts. The board member of the company who was personally awarded the signaling tender for that railway was appointed as an expert at the prosecution stage. Such expertise cannot be made. It is very important that a teacher from ITU refuses to do so. This shows that our demands are more or less heard. ”
REQUESTED BY THE COURT 'WITNESSES WILL BE TAKEN TO THE HALL'
In the interim decision of the second round hearing, the court set 4 as the witness of the 3 person who was tried without arrest and decided to take their statements in the courthouses close to the places where they were ordered. Victims' lawyers said the defendants should be accused of taking statements from the court in the third round of the third round of the hearing is expected to be decided. Victim lawyers, the three identified as witnesses in addition to the high-level people in the court room and ask questions to be brought.
On the other hand, the complainants who have not yet given their testimony will tell the court at the third round of the 10 December hearing on the day and after the accident occurred.
4 WILL BE REQUESTED FOR ARRESTED JUDGMENT OF 3
At the third round hearing, a request from the victim's lawyers will be for the 4 defendant's detention on trial. TCDD 3 Regional Directorate of the persons who were punished between 2 years and 15 years on the charge of “causing death and injury by negligence” Halkalı Turgut Kurt served as Railway Maintenance Manager at 14's Railway Maintenance Directorate. Çerkezköy Özkan Polat, Road Maintenance and Repair Chief at the Road Maintenance Directorate and Çetin Yıldırım, the Chief of Bridges at TCDD, did not accept the demands of the lawyers who requested the arrest at the second round hearing. The lawyers did not demand the arrest of Celaleddin Çabuk, the line maintenance and repair worker at the Road Maintenance Chief, another defendant.