The court decided to flash to the third airport!

The court decided to suspend some of the expropriations for the third airport.


The Council of Ministers, 18 August 2012 construction of the third airport, the third Bosphorus Bridge construction and Channel Istanbul projects on the European side of the Black Sea coast of the 42.300 hectare area as a N reserve building area Bakan. The Ministry of Environment and Urbanization appointed the Prime Ministry Mass Housing Administration (TOKI) to carry out the expropriation work and operations related to this reserve area with the decision of 8 April 2013. TOKI, which has the authority to expropriate, started expropriation works in the areas where these three projects will be made. Since the date of May 2013 land owners have started to offer a price agreement.

TOKI RECEIVED 22 LIRA PER METREKARE FOR LANDPERS

TOKI, in this area within the framework of the third airport 10 separate parcels in the area of ​​total 54.507 square Akcelik Mining, 2 separate parcels in total 9.840 square meters in the area of ​​Ismail Ulasmez, 4.520 square meters, Ozan Mining, 1.998 square land located in the land offered for the expropriation of Topkara Marble . Land owners per square meter per share of the money proposed by TOKI failed to reach an agreement between the parties.

14 OPEN

After that, TOKI, who applied to the court last year, filed a lawsuit against Akçelik Madencilik against 10 and İsmail Tükenmez against 2, Ozan Madencilik and Topkara Marble. The petition of the defendants in the petition of the Council of Ministers by 18 2012 14 dated decision, "Rezevr building area" as a reminder that the area remained. Claiming that the expropriation authority of these plots was granted to him, TOKİ reminded that the land owners did not agree because they did not accept the expropriation price. TOKI, the court, to be determined by the experts to be assigned to the total amount of land belonging to the defendants in the XNUMX parcels land registration is canceled and requested to be registered in his own name.

The 14 case filed by TOKİ for the land owners is also in Istanbul 3. He went to the Civil Court of First Instance. Defendants, reminding that the land of the case remained in the field of construction of the third airport to be built, argued that the amount given by TOKI remained very low compared to their peers. The defendants argued that TOKI made a bid of 22 lira per square meter and the defendants claimed that the square meters in the same area had found the buyer from 35 liras to 300 liras.

COSTUMERS PARTICIPATED THE METREKARE PRICE IN 10

The court sent the files to the 6 personality delegation consisting of civil engineers, map and cadastre engineers, architects and agricultural engineers. The experts reminded that the area where the land is located is within the havaalanı reserve building area alan where the construction of the third airport will be made. The experts stated that the square meter price varies between 200 and 500 TL according to the place of the landlord.

VALUE OF LANDS 16.2 MILLION TL

The experts said that 54.507 million 10 million 901 square land to the Akçelik Mining company expropriated from TOKI was expropriated. 9.840 thousand 2 TL also paid a report to pay the expropriation fee.

TOKI: CAVALILAR WILL NOT benefit from the PLUS VALUE OF THIRD AIRPORT

TOKI, “3. The surplus value added by the airport project to the region is considered as an evaluation measure. This attitude of the expert delegation was approved by the 11. He objected to the expropriation prices determined by the experts with the reason of his Mad violation of the article.

The Court Satisfied

In April, the court asked the plaintiff to deposit the defendant to the bank accounts of the defendant landowners by TOKI. TOKI did not deposit this amount. The court decided to deposit for the second time at the hearings held on 4 June 2014. TOKI did not comply with the decision of the second storage of the court.

The court decided on the 14 case during the hearings he held today. Hüseyin Balaban, the lawyer of TOKİ, stated that the expropriation value determined by the experts was very exorbitant and said irk For this reason we did not fulfill the storage conditions TO.

TOKI'S REPLACEMENT REQUEST REJECTED

Istanbul 3. The first-instance court judge Mehmet Coskun Gunduz, rejected the request of the lawyer Balaban to re-depose the decision of the cases against TOKI. In the previous hearing, the decision of the second storage case, although the amount of the defendant reminded TOKI this amount is not invested in the accounts of the defendant, with the finalization of the verdict decided to remove the expropriation annotation.

AVUKAT GOLD: TOKI RESIDENTIAL AIRPORT AIRPORT CONSTRUCTION

The defendant Kemal Altın, lawyer of Akçelik Madencilik, answered DHA's questions on the phone.

Adı TOKI did not pay for the high amount determined by the experts. According to expert accounts, my client was supposed to pay 11 million TL, but he did not. We have offered 22 TL per square meter. This amount is too low, we did not accept it and sued us. But he lost.

The 14 case, which has been lost today, cannot take any action on the construction of the third bridge in the subject areas. It will either change the project and exclude our lands from the construction of the airport or decide to re-expropriate and initiate a new court process. An option is to make a new deal with the land owners without going to court. We had our 10 case with our 10 parcel. Some parcels in the place where the runway will be equivalent to some of the construction site.

22.1 BILLION EURO PROJECT

The Cengiz-Kolin-Limak-MAPA-Kalyon joint venture won the tender for the third airport, which was planned to be constructed by the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications on the date of 3 May 2013, with the bid of 22 billion 152 million. The groundbreaking ceremony of the airport, which is planned to cost 10 billion 247 million Euros, was made by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan on 7 June 2014.



conversation

Be the first to comment

Comments