Catenary has become a question: 250 Km If the speed went: CHP Istanbul deputy. Sezgin Tanrikulu told Transport Minister Elvan, Kocaeli The cruise line (kataner) is not at the entrance of Kocaeli where the train has slowed down, but 235 - 250 km. What would be the size of the disaster that would have occurred if it were going through a speed? Is it true to claim that not all technical preparations for the safe train operation in YHT between Ankara and Istanbul are completed? Y he said.
Tanrıkulu, Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications Minister Lütfi Elvan in writing written by the request of the written request to the waterfall, the last catenary failure of the Ankara - Istanbul between the speed of the high-speed trains in the public opinion about the reliability of the city once again sual signs of the capital Ankara - Istanbul from the beginning until today. For the YHT line, Tanrıkulu asked which companies are paid for the work and services, including the insurances, and added, oran The number of times the line has been postponed; What are the reasons for postponement? Is it true that it is claimed that not all technical preparations for the safe train operation in the YHT between Ankara and Istanbul are completed? 26 on the YHT line As of July 2014, what are the incomplete technical infrastructures for the safe train operations? Temmuz.
YHT's 20 minute delay leading to the conductor (kataner) which the company or the company is asking for the conformity of the report Tanrıkulu, şirket The tracer (kataner) if the train slowed down the entrance of Kocaeli 235 - 250 km. What would be the dimensions of the disaster that would have occurred if it had been going through a speedy speed? lik Tanrıkulu's questions are as follows:
? If it is correct to claim that there is no operational signal system in a very large part of the line, what are the point points that have no operational signal system as of 26 July 2014? What is the full text of the conformity report submitted by the German TÜV-SÜD Rail Company to the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications? On the date of the 13 March 2009 on the opening of the line, the date of the preliminary operation report issued by the independent audit company TÜV-SÜD was last renewed or confirmed. Is it true that the TÜV-SÜD Rail Company, which is certified to the YHT line, is authorized to provide international certification for maximum 120km / hour speed? If it is true, how is the certification of TÜV-SÜD Rail Company used for the Ankara - İstanbul High Speed Train Line at the speed of 250 km / h? How is the operating speed of the capital Ankara - Istanbul line High Speed Train, which is taking place at a maximum 120 km / hour, at the maximum 250 km / hour, and how is it determined to be XNUMX km / hour? Are the rails used in the YHT line and which are manufactured at the factory of Arcelor Group of Spain, Aceralia, with the rails used in the Madrid-Barcelona line, produced with the same production code? Are the rails produced at the factory of Arcelor Group of Spain for Aceralia having the same durability quality as the rails used in the Madrid-Barcelona line? Is it true that the rails used in the YHT line and which are manufactured at the factory of Arcelor Group of Spain, Aceralia, are produced in low quality from the rails used in Madrid-Barcelona line? Can the copy of the production certificate submitted to the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications for the rails produced by Spanish Aceralia company for use? İspanyol