Ankara-Sivas high-speed train line project has escaped to millions of tunnels

Millions escaped to the tunnel in Ankara-Sivas high-speed train line project: It was claimed that the state was damaged by the state in the Ankara-Sivas high-speed train project of TCDD.
It is claimed that the state has suffered millions of TL losses due to irregularities in the Ankara-Sivas train line project by the contractor partnership, which also includes the company's businessman Mehmet Cengiz, who was mentioned in the corruption tapes of the Internet and came to the agenda with his abusive speeches. According to the news of Firat Kozok from the Cumhuriyet newspaper, the contractor companies have turned to more costly tunnel excavations rather than the low cost excavation and filling works. According to the news, even the warnings of the TCDD not be taken into account.
In 2008, the Ankara-Sivas Railway Project, which was awarded to 840 million TL and decided to liquidate with the work done in 2010 until the contract price, revealed the CHP Istanbul deputy Aykut Erdoğdu in the infrastructure works of Yerköy-Sivas.
Erdoğdu reached the details of the audits conducted by the TCA on the Ankara-Sivas high-speed train project, and revealed how the state was damaged by millions of TL. Accordingly, the process has evolved as follows:
China Major - BE Cengiz-Limak-Mapa-Kolin contractor partnership gave much lower prices for route and borrowing of the line and filling works than the cost unit prices. However, the realization rates of these items, such as “stew of cheap meat will be bad”, remained at low levels.
Contractor partnership, 9 million 225 thousand TL did not do the earth works. As such, a new supply tender was made for the works in this item and the works were carried out by 2. part of the construction. The offer unit prices of the bidders have cost 44.6 million TL.
'Let's make a tunnel.
The contractor, who gave very low bids for the earthworks but did not complete the works, kept the prices high in important items such as tunnel excavation, shotcrete, cladding concrete and wire mesh. The prices given by the contractor partner for these items were almost 2 times difference between the prices given by GCF-Peker Construction.
For example, the contractor partnership determined the unit price for the tunnel excavation in 59.20 TL, while GCF-Peker 41.62 TL; The unit price of the cubic meter for spraying is 306.31 TL, GCF-Peker 30.98; 1789.62 for the concrete again in the cubic meter basis for the price setting, while the GCF-Peker 64.99 and finally; 2.305,50 TL price was determined on a ton basis for wire mesh steel and GCF-Peker gave 716,56 TL price.
The Court of Auditors criticized the following statement:
U As can be seen from the review of the table, it is seen that the tunnel unit bid unit prices of the contractor China Major BE-Cengiz-Limak-Mapa-Kolin joint venture are higher than the bid unit prices of the new contractor GCF-Peker İnşaat by 100 on average. “
These items, which the high price of the contractor's partnership, were removed from the contract. However, the partnership has turned to the tunnel works, which are excluded from the scope of the contract, instead of the excavation and filling works that should be done with the land prices offer unit prices that they offer at low cost prices. Partnership, 9 million 225 thousand TL tunnel production made.
The Court of Auditors did the following:
In According to the approximate cost schedule of the contractor, the tunnel excavation bid unit prices are high, since the route and range excavation and filling bid unit price is low; by the supervisor by considering the writings written by the supervisor of the factory without supervision, but after the completion of the request of the contractor and the request of the TCDD to the consultant firm to do the examination of the work done in the direction of the opinion of the contractor also received technical opinions by receiving the report of the progress report by the contractor It is understood to be organized. düzen
If the new contractor makes half the price
The Court of Accounts found that the joint venture 9 million 225 thousand TL would cost 4 million 54 thousand TL if the work done by the new contractor. The Court of Auditors noted that there was a difference of TL 5 thousand from the process against TCDD.