Ebru Gültekin Ilıcalı case who is flawed: Istanbul, a train on the train while riding two traitors of Ebru Ilıcalı'yla 'flawed' one 'flawless' he said.
In the case opened after the death of academician Ebru Gültekin Ilıcalı, who was trapped between the train and the train as a result of the sudden closure of his 3 son in a carriage at Feneryolu Railway Station, Ilıcalı's second expert report was prepared.
Ilıcalı'nın family of the first expert report "the excitement of motherhood" Ebru Ilıcalı'nin moving with the decision was decided to be perfect, the second expert report in the report when the train is trapped in the door holding the children's car trolley and the passenger is not working to listen to the warnings of the main flawed emphasized that the main contradiction.
Ilıcalı's family reacted to the second report, while he drew attention to the big difference between the two experts. Ilıcalı's sister Canan Fergan, Assoc. Dr. Kemal Selçuk Öğüt was involved in TCDD training programs. Fergan, doğru TCDD is the defendant in the case of a trainer in the case of a person is an expert in the case of expertise? Is it moral and legal? The expert didn't even fully understand the incident. As a defendant we have already taken the report of TCDD which we want to be included in the hearing. Zaten
The lawyer of the family, Abdullah Kaya said, a You will say that the closure of the door is a flaw and the security principle has been violated, and you will say that a human foot will not enter between the platform and the train. And you're going to call it Ebru. It was revealed how the party was a party and how it was related to it before. Bil
Source : gundem.milliyet.com.t is
Günceleme: 11/11/2018 19:12